Absolutely not.

	Schools enable students to interact with each other, and this is an important element in growing up, learning and becoming socially responsible citizens.
	Schools also furnish structure and can provide a means for ensuring that students devote time to necessary studies.
	Under proper circumstances, schools can foster peer pressure to aid learning.

If schools were eliminated, the probable alternative would be to have education take place in homes of students. Although home schooling is advantageous for some children, conditions in the homes of others would impede learning.

We want to supplement school learning, not substitute it. We can ensure that the learning of one individual will never be hindered by the abilities or weaknesses of others. Each student will move at his or her own pace, unaffected by the rate of learning of any other student.

And although, theoretically, any student in a class can ask questions, in reality, those who are confused are often embarrassed and don't wish to reveal their ignorance. Frequently, only the most intelligent students dare to ask questions because they know that if they don't understand, neither does anybody else.

Let's assume your child goes to a coaching class. You have chosen the class with great care, based on the recommendations of students who have studied there or are currently studying there.

The question to ask is, does the coaching class provide your child with an ideal learning environment? Do they have ideal mentors? For instance:

	Are they knowledgeable in all subjects?
	Are they aware of precisely what your child knows, so that they can avoid undue repetition, and at the same time, ensure that all necessary instruction is provided?
	Are they paying attention to the individual needs and abilities that your child has?
	Do they have enough time to give your child individual attention whenever needed without holding up other students?
	Do these tutors have the flexibility to instruct a little differently sometimes when your child forgets something or has difficulty in grasping a point?
	Are you saying that coaching class tutors never chastise your child when he or she is less than perfect?
	Are you sure that these tutors, while pointing out mistakes, are always praising your child's accomplishments and encouraging him or her to proceed further?
	And of course, what exactly do coaching classes do when your child falls behind because of sickness or absence? Do they take the lessons again?

There are actually two concerns here. One is to shield the child from leakage of radiation from computer screens. Even if modern computer screens emanate very little radiation, you may want to buy and attach a shield, especially if you think that your child sits too close to the monitor. Our intent is to deliver and hence use 30 - 40 minutes of focussed lessons per session.

The second concern is that your child may strain his or her eyes from reading the computer screen. Actually, modern colour monitors, with properly adjusted brightness and contrast, make reading less tiring than the old black and white screens. In fact, tests have shown that reading from computer monitors does not seem to be any more dangerous to eyesight than reading from books and watching television.

Students fritter away time while their tutor stands before them in classrooms. They become masters at tuning out boring lessons from their minds and daydreaming about more interesting topics. They sit silently and passively, paying no attention and learning nothing. The situation is no different in a large coaching class. Since such students cause no disturbance, most tutors don't bother.

On the contrary our pages are designed to stimulate and excite. Pupils are not likely to wander off into daydreams when they are being kept busy and interested. The interactive features will be a powerful force to keep such students working and enjoying his lessons.